White House Releases New Guidance Expanding Federal AI Oversight
The White House set new requirements for neutral AI in federal contracts while pushing for a unified national AI policy.
The Office of Management and Budget provided new guidance for federal agencies Thursday on how to procure “unbiased” artificial intelligence, a followup to President Donald Trump’s July executive order.
The memorandum requires agencies to apply two core principles to AI systems they procure: truth-seeking and ideological neutrality. AI must provide accurate, evidence-based responses and clearly acknowledge uncertainty where information is incomplete or contradictory. It must also operate as a nonpartisan tool, avoiding the intentional encoding of political or ideological judgments, unless explicitly prompted or readily accessible to the end user, according to the memo.
Federal agencies will be required to integrate these principles into new procurement contracts and modify existing contracts where possible. The memo also directs federal agencies to require documentation from AI vendors that includes model and system cards detailing the training process, risk mitigation strategies and evaluation scores on benchmarks assessing accuracy and bias. Vendors must also supply acceptable use policies, user guides and mechanisms for end-user feedback to ensure AI outputs meet the federal guidelines.
Agencies are expected to update policies by March 11, 2026, to ensure compliance across all federal AI contracts. The memo also establishes a sunset provision, meaning the guidance will expire in two years unless extended by the OMB director.
White House Pushes for National AI Framework
OMB’s memo coincided with President Trump’s executive order, which seeks to limit the authority of states to regulate AI and establish a unified national AI policy.
“We remain in the earliest days of this technological revolution and are in a race with adversaries for supremacy within it,” Trump said in the order. “To win, United States AI companies must be free to innovate without cumbersome regulation. But excessive State regulation thwarts this imperative. … State-by-State regulation by definition creates a patchwork of 50 different regulatory regimes that makes compliance more challenging, particularly for start-ups.”
The order directs the attorney general to establish an AI Litigation Task Force to challenge state AI laws inconsistent with the order, specifically laws that have “cumbersome regulation” or “imbed ideological bias.” The administration argues that diverging state standards threaten U.S. competitiveness and could slow progress against global rivals, particularly China.
The order also directs the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto David Sacks to craft legislative recommendations for Congress that would establish a national standard and formally preempt state laws. Sacks said more than 1,000 AI-related bills are advancing through state legislatures. Allowing them to stand would leave the industry navigating “50 states running in 50 different directions,” he said Thursday during the Oval Office order signing.
This is a carousel with manually rotating slides. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate or jump to a slide with the slide dots
-
Federal AI Series: Security Priorities
AI security threats, data protection and emerging defenses power federal agency tech strategies as AI adoption accelerates.
7m watch Partner Content -
How the Marine Corps Is Building a High-Tech Future Fleet
The Marine Corps is leveraging AI to automate tedious tasks, enhance data readiness and accelerate mission-critical functions.
8m watch -
Who’s in Charge of AI at Every Federal Agency
New AI memos from the Trump administration prompt federal agencies to establish chief AI officers and OMB to launch a new CAIO AI Council.
7m read -
Navy Installations Shift to Continuous Cybersecurity Model
Shery Thomas details how Navy Installations Command is aligning with the service’s continuous cybersecurity strategy.
14m watch